![SOLVED: It is easy to show that the converse of Fermat' s Theorem does not hold; i.e, the congruence a" =a (mod n) for all a does not imply that n is SOLVED: It is easy to show that the converse of Fermat' s Theorem does not hold; i.e, the congruence a" =a (mod n) for all a does not imply that n is](https://cdn.numerade.com/ask_images/92c6b113d60b4916a7913dae7abc4d45.jpg)
SOLVED: It is easy to show that the converse of Fermat' s Theorem does not hold; i.e, the congruence a" =a (mod n) for all a does not imply that n is
![90.25 Another calculus proof of the location of Fermat's point | The Mathematical Gazette | Cambridge Core 90.25 Another calculus proof of the location of Fermat's point | The Mathematical Gazette | Cambridge Core](https://static.cambridge.org/content/id/urn%3Acambridge.org%3Aid%3Aarticle%3AS0025557200179288/resource/name/firstPage-S0025557200179288a.jpg)
90.25 Another calculus proof of the location of Fermat's point | The Mathematical Gazette | Cambridge Core
![Fermat's Theorem's converse#Converse of fermat's Theorem is not true with examples explained in urdu - YouTube Fermat's Theorem's converse#Converse of fermat's Theorem is not true with examples explained in urdu - YouTube](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/jQJATuxFkuA/maxresdefault.jpg)